THE RELATIVE IMMUNITY OF THE SKIN AND CARDIOVASCULAR
SYSTEM TO THE DIRECT EFFECTS OF HIGH VOLTAGE - HIGH
FREQUENCY COMPONENT ELECTRICAL PULSES.
Robert A. Stratbucker, Health Tech. Corp., 10744 West Center Road, Omaha, NE 68124
Matthew G. Marsh, Paktronix, 1602 North 59th Street, Omaha, NE 68104
Abstract - This paper summarizes our testing to date of
commercially available battery powered hand held electric pulse
generators, sometimes called TASER's, stun guns, or Less Than
Lethal Weapons (LTLW). We present the generalized
electronic properties of these devices along with physiologic
effects on human and animal subjects.
A. Introduction
The objectives of this work fall into two primary categories:
1. To characterize by physical measurements the electrical
emissions from a representative cross section of commercially
available battery powered hand held electric pulse generators
whose primary application is in effecting non-lethal compliance
and control of persons (or animals) whose manifest or latent
behavior constitutes a perceived threat to the safety and well
being of the holder of such a device; and
2. To further characterize by physiologic testing the biologic
interactions of such emissions as they may effect the safety and
effectiveness of such devices in the hands of their holders when
such devices are used both in the prescribed manner as well as
certain unexpected ways in healthy and previously sensitized
individuals.
B. Methods
1. Physical Measurements: Most of the devices tested were
designed to generate a default arcing condition in the air gap
between closely spaced opposing interior projections of the two
principal forward facing output terminals which are spaced 50
mm apart. Such arcs only occur when the output transformers
feeding the terminals are electrically unloaded and peak
potential across the interior probes exceeds the dielectric
breakdown value of the air gap. Contacting the skin with the
forward probes under almost any orientation or pressure and
with virtually any topical condition of the skin significantly
loads the output transformer resulting in a lowered output
voltage which extinguishes arcing. A 20,000 dummy test load
composed of twenty 1000 one watt resistors in series was
used in all the testing. Graphic recordings were taken with a
Model 2654 Tektronics oscilloscope operating in the
differential mode. The probes were placed across a 20 resistor
in the center of the test load providing a differential voltage
divider factor of 1000. Further voltage division was
accomplished using the scope attenuation controls. The battery
powered pulse generator under test was entirely self-contained
with no ground reference.
2. Physiologic Measurements:
a. Skin - Twenty 21-50 year old male police officer volunteers
were exposed to 3 second bursts of the pulse generator output
delivered to the volar aspect of one forearm. A non-electric
pressure injury of a similar degree was applied to the
contralateral arm. These sessions took place during regularly
scheduled training programs specifically related to
familiarization with the devices. Color photographs of the
exposed sites were taken at 1 and 10 minutes post shock and
again at 24 hours.
b. Cardiovascular System - Two 60 Kg Hampshire gilts were
anesthetized with 20mg/Kg of Ketamine and supported under
5% Halothane and O2 anesthesia. Venous bipolar pacing
catheters were placed in the right ventricle under fluoroscopic
control. Twenty shocks of 3-5 seconds each were delivered to
the endocardium by passing pulses from the two terminals of
the pulse generator to the pacing leads of the catheter. Arterial
blood pressure and surface EKG were recorded before, during,
and after the application of the pulses.
C. Results
1. Physical measurements: Units from 5 different device
companies were tested. Listed in random order these
manufacturers were:
a. Ultron - 2 models
b. Omega - 2 models
c. Nova - 1 model
d. U.S. Protector - 1 model
e. Guardian - 1 model
Some features common to all devices:
1. Pulse repetition rate, 5 to 25 Pulses Per Second
2. A single transistor relaxation oscillator with internal etched
PCB spark gap, driving a high ratio ferrite stepup
transformer.
3. Charging capacitors ranging 0.2 to 0.6 mfd.
4. One or two 9v battery power source.
Some features unique among devices:
1. One with a very high voltage output capacitor (not the
charging capacitor) across the output transformer yeilding
resonance enhancement.
2. One with hermetically sealed internal spark gap.
3. One with 30% lower output impedance than the average of
the others.
4. One with loaded peak voltage 3.5 times the lowest.
2. Physiologic measurements
a. Skin - All twenty subjects exhibited the typical "signature
response", specifically a punctate reddening of the skin at 10
minutes post shock limited to a 3-5mm diameter circle directly
under each probe. Five out of 20 showed small wheals at the
stimulus site. All of these hive-like elevations had disappeared
at 1 to 2 hours. Only one case, a man of mediterranean ancestry,
showed residual markings at 24 hours and these were gone in
2 days. No burns or other permanent markings were ever noted.
b. Cardiovascular - One device with 50kv output peak potential
was used to deliver ten 3-5 second bursts to the pig's
endocardium. In no case was there any evidence of alteration in
the heart rhythm, or significant blood pressure variations
occurring during or after the bursts.
Finally, these same tests were repeated in the presence of 1mg
of epinephrine administered IV. The expected elevation of
blood pressure and heart rate occurred in each case, but without
any evidence of sensitization to the
effects of the endocardial stimulus. No
malignant rhythms or their progenitors
were ever seen.
D. Discussion
Although little has been published in the
medical or bioengineering literature on
subject of less than lethal weapons
(LTLW's), the U.S. federal government
has had a keen interest in the subject
since the Johnson administration [1]. This
interest was renewed in the mid 80's with
a special symposium on the subject
sponsored by the U.S. Dept. of Justice
[2]. Bernstein [3] in the mid 70's
attempted to characterize the TASER, a
ballistic counterpart to the hand held
devices, in terms of the 60Hz equivalent
energy delivered to a subject. He updated
his treatment of the subject to include certain hand held devices
in 1985 [4]. Stratbucker [5] reported the first animal studies
involving LTLW's in the bioengineering literature in 1986.
Most recently Roy, et. al., [6] have published a report
describing apparent ventricular fibrillation associated with the
direct epicardial application of a stun gun to exposed pig hearts.
This work appears to draw on prior work from the Canadian
group related to high frequency transients encountered in the
electric power industry. Our study appears to be at some
variance with the Canadian group's work. The difference may
lie in the dissimilar current density patterns associated with
differing application techniques. To our knowledge no one has
ever demonstrated an arrhythmic effect of LTLW's when
applied anywhere on the exterior of the body, human or
otherwise.
References
[1] Natl. Comm. on Causes & Prevention of Violence, U.S.
Govt. Printing Office, Wash. D.C., 1969
[2] Atty. Gen. Conf. on LTLW, U.S. Dept. Justice Report, FBI
Academy, June 11-12 1986
[3] T. Bernstein, "Lethality evaluation for the TASER Electric
Gun", AAMI Ann. Meeting, March 1978
[4] T. Bernstein, "Evaluation of the Electric Shock Hazard for
the NOVA XR 5000 Stun Gun", Madison WI, 1985
[5] R.A. Stratbucker, "The assesment of potential cardiac
hazards in the use of hand-held electronic law enforcement
devices", Proc. 8th Ann. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. & Bio. Soc.,
Nov. 1986
[6] O.Z.Roy, A.S.Podgorski, "Tests on a shocking device - the
stun gun", Med. & Bio. Eng. & Comp., 27, 445-448, 1989
|